Area voters overwhelmingly approve both amendments
Last Modified: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 at 11:58 p.m.
Northwest Alabama voters overwhelmingly endorsed two statewide amendments Tuesday, including one that will give the Shoals more state financial backing for an economic development project eyeing the area.
Colbert County
Yes -- 2,832
No -- 926
Yes -- 3,114
No -- 656
Franklin County
Yes -- 1,137
No -- 485
Yes -- 1,295
No -- 332
Lauderdale County
Yes -- 3,314
No -- 1,327
Yes -- 3,723
No -- 929
Lawrence County
Yes -- 1,344
No -- 744
Yes -- 1,537
No -- 564
- Tax could exceed expectations
- Industries prepare for work force
- Training class set for January
- Detroit company hired for plant
- Cramer discusses work force development with college
- Tax increase begins today
- State committee OKs bond issue
- 1,800 jobs coming to Shoals
- Bringing plant to the Shoals involved many people, hurdles
- What was once a farm will be home to mile-long plant
- Work could start in weeks
- Area prepares for expanded welding trade
- Locals respond to company locating in Shoals
- Colbert votes to rescind Barton Park covenants
- Officials to make 'major announcement'
- Railcar company ready to pick Shoals
- Lauderdale votes to implement tax hike
- Commission expected to vote today on tax
- Sales tax in Colbert will increase Aug. 1
- Talks to begin on imposing sales tax
- Gov. Riley signs local economic legislation
- State voters approve two amendments
- Senate passes Shoals tax bills
- Sales tax bill goes to Senate
- SEDA seeking more power, board changes
- Commission receives draft bill, prepares to advertise proposal
- Sales tax proposal heading to legislators
- Vote expected today on sales tax
- Colbert OKs resolution calling for tax increase
- Session could be a busy one for local legislators
- Officials hammer out tax proposal
- Residents sound off about proposed sales tax increase
- Some commissioners undecided about tax
- Adopt the incentives
- Meeting addresses sales-tax proposal
- Fund talk gets ugly
- Legislators have questions about fund
- Incentive fund seen as major recruiting tool
- Shoals chamber supports development fund
- SEDA officials seek sales tax increase
- Incentives could be big part of landing project
- More names needed to help land 'the big one'
- Large company eyeing northwest Alabama
Voter turnout in Colbert, Franklin, Lauderdale and Lawrence counties was light, but those who voted spoke clearly.
Amendment 1, which increases the limit for the Capital Improvement Trust Fund, received huge support -- carrying 8,627-3,482 in the four counties.
The 71.2 percent approval vote is nearly 9 percentage points below the state total even though the amendment directly affects the northwest Alabama region.
Raising the cap on the fund will help the state pay for commitments it has made to help a German steel plant open in Mobile and will be used to provide incentives for what has been dubbed "Project Tiger," a Canadian boxcar manufacturing operation looking to build in Colbert County.
Project Tiger promises to employ between 1,500 and 1,800 people. An announcement on the site selected for the project is expected later this month or in early July.
U.S. Rep. Bud Cramer, D-Ala., said Tuesday's vote is a "victory for continued economic growth in Alabama."
"North Alabama has been aggressive with industry recruitment and the vote today will allow us to keep working to bring quality jobs to our area," said Cramer, who represents the Shoals.
Voters in the four counties also said they want state money that is set aside to pay health-care costs for retired state and education employees to be used only for that purpose. Passage of Amendment 2 will require that.
That measure was approved by voters in the four counties by a 9,669-2,481, or 79.6. That percentage is very close to the statewide vote.
About 10 percent of the registered voters in the four northwest Alabama counties participated in Tuesday's election.
"It's about what we expected," said Lauderdale County Probate Judge Dewey Mitchell. "Everyone had their opportunity, though."
Alabama Development Office Director Neal Wade said the positive vote on Amendment 1 will help industrial development throughout Alabama.
Wade wouldn't answer specific questions about Project Tiger, but he said there are seven or eight "mega projects" being negotiated that will be helped by passage of Amendment 1.
Wade defined a "mega project" as anything promising more than 500 jobs.
He said there's another mega project being worked on for north Alabama, but he declined to identify it. The project is believed to be targeting Marion County.
"We're still negotiating an outstanding mega project (in north Alabama)," he said.
Wade said he couldn't disclose the state economic incentive package, including the amount being offered for Project Tiger.
"We have not completed negotiations on (Project Tiger), so until we complete negotiations we really don't know what the amount will be for the project," Wade said.
"Obviously, what we said since the special session (on Amendment 1) is there are seven or eight mega projects that the funding is affected by the Legislature taking action and (by Tuesday's) vote," he said.
Jeff Emerson, a spokesman for Gov. Bob Riley, was a little more direct when asked if Tuesday's vote was critical for the success of Project Tiger.
"There are about 30 projects that could be affected by Amendment 1," Emerson said. "Project Tiger is definitely one of them."
Dana Beyerle can be reached at (334) 264-6605 or dtb12345@aol.com.
Next Article in
Events Calendar More Events Submit Event
- After 20 years, bank president still enjoys job
- Teen dies after being hit by truck
- Attorney: Death was violent
- Some schools and offices closed for Columbus Day
- Officials: More road construction in future
- Inmate health-care issues make budgeting difficult
- Law & Order
- O's woes
- Alabama's 'economy of hope'
- Man faces drug charges
- Starting over 0 min ago
- Spud sense 0 min ago
- Museums generate interest, not money 0 min ago
- Man discovers ancestor was Helen Keller's cook 0 min ago
- Crunch time arrives for No. 2 Lions 0 min ago
- Residents cast vote of confidence 0 min ago
- Linens 'n Things chain facing liquidation 0 min ago
- Troubled times for Auburn, Tuberville 0 min ago
- Work under way for new company 0 min ago
- Law & Order 0 min ago

Comments
Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
June 6, 2007 6:49:10 am
RE: http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20.../NEWS/706060333/1011Who are these people who went out and voted YES? Can they not read, do they want higher taxes, are they in favor of unemployment, do they think state employees have a constitutional right to health care benefits or did they just not know any better?
June 6, 2007 8:49:27 am
FOR ALL THE COMPLAININGI HEAR ABOUT THE GOVERNMENTBECAUSE IT MEANS WE HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH..
June 6, 2007 9:27:08 am
I think your post proves we live in a country overflowing with illiterate adults. That must be why so many people voted YES at the polls yesterday. Thanks for clearing that up.
June 6, 2007 9:34:07 am
TSC, Yep, you are correct!!! And those who voted YES are going to live to regret it when they see NO return on their YES vote, only Mobile will make out like a BANDIT... Here in North Alabama, we will get forgotten in all that mess!!!
June 6, 2007 9:40:22 am
I partly blame the legislature and our governor for making these amendments appear to be something they were not in order to pursuade people to vote in favor of them. I also blame the people who didn't do any research on the topic and just blindly voted what they were told to by the media. We should do as Australia and make voting madatory. Those who fail to vote risk a fine and, in rare cases, imprisonment. I like the idea, it's a sensible way to ensure that elections reflect the will of all of the people.
June 6, 2007 10:55:33 am
Move to Australia.....NOW!!!
June 6, 2007 11:05:50 am
Alas, I cannot move to Australia. They are tougher on immigration than the US. How about you stick with the posted topic? Voting, voter apathy, voter turnout, the proposed amendments, AL government, etc.
June 6, 2007 12:10:39 pm
This campaign was run like so many political campaigns are run nowadays. Scare tactics.
The pro-amendment idea was simple.
A yes vote meant you were for 5000 jobs and a shining future for Alabama.
A no vote meant you were against 5000 jobs and you wanted Alabamians to remain poor and destitute.
In other words yes=your a good person and no= your a bad person. Then spend a lot of money on TV commercials and newspaper ads implying this and viola! people will vote yes, and they won't have to worry about the insignificant things such as facts. People can vote yes and feel good about themselves.
Basically what our legislature and governor were saying is " don't worry about thinking, we'll do your thinking for you", and it worked.
June 6, 2007 12:42:51 pm
I voted in favor of both amendments. The first one will bring more jobs into the State, including the Shoals area. That's got to be good.
The second one is no extra burden on the taxpayer...it prohibits using money already set aside for retired state employee and educator health care from being used for anything else.
June 6, 2007 12:44:22 pm
I personally dont know any one who took the time to vote yesterday. I didnt. Did you?
Post a comment | View all comments