News

EPA officials examine former plating factory

Jim Hannon/TimesDaily
Environmental Protection Agency contractors sample materials at an old metal plating facility in the Sweetwater district of Florence.
Published: Thursday, November 20, 2008 at 3:30 a.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 at 10:23 p.m.

FLORENCE - Workers in yellow hazmat suits assessed old barrels of chemicals and secured a worn-down building Wednesday as part of the EPA's bid to assess and eventually clean up what used to be a chrome plating factory in east Florence.

"We're trying to mitigate any releases into the environment and clean up the waste that was left here," said Jordan Jarrard, on-scene coordinator for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Richards Metal Plating on Royal Avenue was originally slated as top priority for environmental assessment when the city was awarded $400,000 in EPA grant funds in April.

The Alabama Department of Environmental Management did an initial assessment of the building and site and found plating waste that is "extremely expensive to dispose of," said Larry Norris, chief of redevelopment for ADEM.

EPA's emergency removal and stabilization will get rid of any immediate environmental threats, Norris said.

"We have limited financial capability when it comes to dealing with that much waste," Norris said of disposal that could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

"People may go 'EPA - that's scary,' " said Melissa Bailey, city planner.

She said, however, that EPA's assessment and proposed clean-up of the site may allow the city to use the $400,000 to assess other sites, such as the nearby depot and foundry, high on the city's list for environmental assessment. In 2007, the city rezoned the Sweetwater Arts and Entertainment district and has eyed the electroplating site as a potential parking spot for the district.

All three sites are brownfields, places that have environmental pollution or even the perception of pollution.

EPA officials plan to wrap up their visit today. So far, the workers in the yellow hazmat suits have collected containers and drums and done preliminary work on identifying chemicals, Jarrard said.

The workers will collect soil samples to determine what chemicals if any have leeched into the ground.

Workers fixed a hole in the back part of the roof and secured the building against trespassers and exposure to the outside environment, Jarrad said.

EPA officials will return at an unknown date to remove the chemicals from the building and begin cleaning up the rest of the site.

"Currently, it is safe right now; people don't need to be worried about being exposed," Jarrad said. "That's what we're here for."

Trevor Stokes can be reached at 740-5728 or trevor.stokes@TimesDaily.com.


All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be re-published without permission. Links are encouraged.

Comments

    Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
  1. mb5020 says...
    November 20, 2008 6:51:56 am

    RE: Link

    The most obvious and glaring question with this article is: Why are the most-recent owners/operators of Richards Metal Plating not cleaning up their site? Subsequent questions include: Why was the site not cleaned up when it closed? Why are these owners/operators not being held accountable for their business?
    The creativity comes in the answers when the strategic wool-pulling occurs.

    Report this post

  2. cjtl1000r says...
    November 20, 2008 8:15:34 am

    Thats the same question I had when reading the story as well. Whom should be contacted to answer hat question?

    Report this post

  3. harrypotter17 says...
    November 20, 2008 8:41:53 am

    I wonder if any of those toxins got into water supply of local well owners?

    Report this post

  4. Rowdymale says...
    November 20, 2008 10:11:50 am

    There are no local well owners there. It's all city water.

    Report this post

  5. mb5020 says...
    November 20, 2008 12:16:04 pm

    For starters, the City's License office then, likely, ADEM. Nevermind the reasons the business closed, the owners had a duty and responsibility to leave their location clean when they vacated it. A survey of the site as a whole for brownfield purposes is understandable, but the closed business should have been found (obviously in Utopia) clean.

    Looks like another case of, "Oh, I'm not worried about it. The government will take care of it."

    Report this post

  6. FirenzeVeritas says...
    November 20, 2008 1:03:32 pm

    Richards had wanted to buy the old Foundry/Martin Plant and the city refused to give them zoning for it, as I recall.

    Report this post

  7. ausar7772000 says...
    November 20, 2008 2:46:21 pm

    As a former employee of said plating plant, I can understand the "logic" behind the cut and run tactics there.Everyone who worked there, with the exception of a few, were grossly underpaid and offered no form of retirement or insurance...kinda fits the mold, so to speak, that they would leave the place in such a mess..

    Report this post

  8. E. T. says...
    November 20, 2008 3:01:20 pm

    End of East Florence Ent. Dist.? Link

    Report this post

  9. mb5020 says...
    November 20, 2008 6:07:31 pm

    Great first post! I can only speak for me: I respect and appreciate you stepping up to provide some insight.

    Report this post

Next Article in